Saturday, May 23, 2009

Post Star Trek Reflections (SPOILER ALERT)

First off - I will simply say, I was pleased; at least as much as I'd hoped I would be, and maybe more. As the resident "purist," and one who's felt the franchise has totally lost its way in the years following the death of Gene Roddenberry. there was certainly the possibility that the producers would allow the least common denominator trash everything about the original series which I held dear. And I have to say - there was very little about it that entered that territory; and nothing that really sticks in my mind. So kudos, overall, to the filmmakers for successfully balancing that tightwire of making a product that sells and throwing out numerous, obligatory bones to the likes of me.

Other ruminations

  • The casting of everyone but Sulu and Uhura seemed superb. As Mixdorf said, Karl Urban did an uncanny McCoy; and I thought the two principals were just what they needed to be. Chekov, suprisingly good - not just in the accent, but in the actual timbre and inflection of the voice. Wow. But I gotta say, Uhura and Sulu both appeared to be cast by someone who thinks that all black people and Japanese look alike. Uhura was a little more "supermodel-ey" than seemed appropriate for the character.
  • Sulu: a lot more badass than in the TV series, and Chekov, waaaaay more competent.
  • This is geeking out a bit, but....in no reference from the original series do I recall any mention of the fact that the Planet Vulcan was destroyed, and that only 10,000 or so Vulcans survived. Was that merely invented for this movie and - if so - wow, what liberty taken! Not that it seems totally wrong or anything - just, wow.
  • Geeking out a bit more: Knowing simply of the appearance of the line, "I have been, and always shall be, your friend," in the film, I decided it might not be a bad idea to acquaint Sharon with Star Trek II: The Wrath of Khan, wherein lies the origin of that line. And of course, if you're going to watch STII, you'd better precede it with Space Seed, from the original series, which introduces the character of Khan (played by Ricardo Montalbon, of course). I could not believe the number of references lifted directly from that episode and that movie. Even for the non-freaks, I would highly recommend watching the episode, Wrath of Khan, new Star Trek movie sequence; in order to add a little context, almost in "special features" style. An awful lot of Star Trek history and characterization is laid out in those two works.
  • A lot of those "bones" tossed out; references from the original series. From the more obvious "I'm a doctor, not a..." line for the almost casual fan, to the acknowledgement that Kirk grew up in Iowa, for those of us a little more versed in episodic lore.
  • So what - in addition to the planet Vulcan; we are to assume that Romulus (on the edge of The Neutral Zone, not on the edge of Detroit; though that one may be seeing its last days as well) will be destroyed just a couple of generations into the Star Trek future?
  • Save the Federation or not; that was a mighty quick ascendancy to the command of the flagship of Starfleet.
  • On the overall plot: I don't see a lot of action flicks these days. Truly, the crux of the plot (alien from future, wreaking vengeance; "red matter" creating black hole; good guys having to land at high velocity and kick a lot of ass on the edge of high-up mechanical precipeces; etc. etc. could really be swapped out with dozens...(hundreds?) of other plots of sci-fi/action films. And that's cool, I suppose. All I ask is that the dialogue and personal interactions between characters not make me roll my eyes. Anything better than that is generally cake & ice cream for me. And I did think there was some really nice, solid dialogue tying together the somewhat par-for-the-course plot, which was really just background noise for how these characters came together.
  • Speaking of which - what is it about battling on high, mechanical bridges? And why does every action movie nowadays require a scene (this one has two!) in which the protagonist is hanging by his fingertips at a high altitude with a bad guy trying to step on his fingers? Folks, we're entering hottie-falling-in-the-woods-while-chased-by-axe-murderer territory here. Surely, there's another way or two bring an action sequence to its climax. Let's get creative and work on it.
  • Really geeking out, here; but a nitpicker one right here: There is an old Star Trek episode that introduces Romulans; who make a reappearance about 50 years following their first contact with humans, which was an armed conflict. In that episode, it is said that the original conflict predated ship-to-ship visuals; and so no human or Romulan had ever seen the other. Main purpose with that was one of Gene Roddenberry's lessons on race & tolerance, as the ship of the Enterprise discovers that Romulans- surprise! - look just like Vulcans and share common anscestry. Anyway - that's a little inconsistant with this episode, which Kirk battling Romulans in hand-to-hand combat.
  • Spock and Uhura romance - wow, wonder what that came from, and if they plan to explain how it ends, sometime in the future.
  • No Nurse Chapel (though you hear her being called for in the background). No Yeoman Rand. No Transporter Chief Kyle, but (ok, starting to scrape the bottom of the barrel here, but get THIS); Transporter Chief Kyle was on the bridge of the Reliant in Wrath of Khan. Never noticed that before.
  • Too much Leonard Nimoy!!! Appearing at first, wonderful (but yet another nod to Star Wars, as the Obi Wan parallel is uncanny). As the movie goes on, though, it becomes increasingly apparent, that Future Spock, like a creepy old grandfather, just refuses to go away. People not familiar with the series might expect all the episodes to include this ancient Spock double to be there, continually offering up mystical Dungeon Master-styled advice and quips. Anyway - a brief cameo would have been fine.
  • Brilliant, almost perfect (and, as Mixx suggested, emotional) birth story for Kirk, at the beginning.
  • Also like Mixx, I look forward to future installments.

7 comments:

Pat said...

Time travel resolves the issue of the fate of Vulcan. A future Spock (after the original series and perhaps well after any of the follow on series (Vulcans live very long) fails to save Romulus and sends himself back in time along with angry Romulan to change the past. It's an all new mythology from that point on. As far as we know, Picard will never exist.

I have less of an issue with fight scenes on high precipices as I do with the reasoning behind such precipices. The giant drill thing - I'll accept that. The bizarre interior of the Romulan ship that looks like MC Escher designed it? What the hell? What practical purpose do crazy ramps that don't intersect with one another have. In addition to being a warlike race, apparently Romulans are also wildly impractical in their use of space.

I think that having all of the main characters be more competent than their originals is fine. The OG was campy and relied on some amount of buffonery to keep the episodes moving. You wouldn't expect Starfleet to put anyone on their flagship that wasn't the best at what they do, even if they have some other character quirks (McCoy).

I wonder what happens in Iowa in the future to create the second Grand Canyon?

I too was surprised by the volume of Nimoy.

And since when would it Starfleet protocol to shoot a disobedient officer off onto a dangerous and largely uninhabited planet? To have that result in a meeting with both future Spock and Montgomery Scott is truly plot shenanigans.

Dan said...

ooo - good point on the Iowan Grand Canyon. Didn't even think of that. Maybe it was a quarry. I guess the "speeding car racing towards the edge of a cliff" is sort of in the "fight in the mechanical precipice" category. One per action flick.

Shooting disobidient officer out of the ship. I suppose it was mutiny. At a time of war, in the midst of deep space; perhaps that is exactly what you do with an insubordinate. Or what you should do. God knows, there's a track record of malcontents singlehandedly taking over the Enterprise. Best to nip that in the bud, if possible. That and/or simply post more than one guard on a prisoner; preferably with their eyes looking towards the confined party's quarters.

Mighty Tom said...

I really want to see the movie before I read this post. I appreciate the spoiler alert.

Pat said...

Get on it!

urflabor: the work done by German midgets

Stephen Cummings said...

I just saw it yesterday. I'm not a purist. I'm just old enough to have seen several of the movies in theaters; certainly old enough to be able to say I saw "Star Trek: The Motion Picture" at the College Square 4 when I was eight. I remember the blockbuster buzz around that film; the line was huge, I recall, spanning down the original corridor and into the main thoroughfare of the mall. I also recall I slept through most of it.

Anyway, as an agnostic, I can say I enjoyed the thing, but as a generally silly action picture. My impressions of the original show and TNG were that they were more cerebral; this is summer flick stuff.

I guess I didn't realize before Spock's logic is not a genetic characteristic, but a creed to live by.

Dan said...

I can see why the original ST might seem to be rather "cerebral," given the general geeky nature of its fan base. However, if you really spend much time at all with the original episodes, you quickly get the idea that they are a lot more similar to 'Bonanza' than they are to 'Frontline.' Messages of a progressive, ahead-of-its-time ideolology being delivered - but in a way that was all about odd camera angles, fisticuffs, and go-go boots. TNG was a little more cerebral, but often tried a little too hard, with a Nancy-boy style of political correctness that often came across as cheese.

Vulcan logic: oh yes. According to the original "canon," Vulcans had a more barbaric and violent history than our own, which necessitated the adoption of their later philosophy.

GIVEN A LITTLE MORE THOUGHT: If we are to assume the "butterfly affect" of the Romulan ship coming back (not so "butterfly"-like, with the destruction of the entire planet Vulcan) renders the entire history of episodes essentially moot; could not that different trajectory of history also mean that the Romulan planet somehow avoids its catastrophe (and, thus, Nero never goes back in time, etc. etc.), which would actually then allow original history to continue, in its original manner? My brain hurts...Anyway, this enables us to consider each arc of history as equally possible or valid, which gives the new creators a guilt-free canvas, really.

Pat said...

Exactly right.