The Hike
So, we've got a pre-teen triathlete in the house who works out compulsively and can do possibly twice as many pullups as me (no kidding) who proclaims "I'm not all that into hiking." So that's a little backdrop to our strategy of when & where to explore in the park. We know that, above all other places, Lake Superior has a quality that can just still her soul. Where she is otherwise driven and anxious, she can just sit on the shore of that magnificent lake and look out for a seemingly endless time. Our great hope is she will find the majesty of the mountains similarly inspiring. But we decide to take it relatively conservative on day one, both as a result of the unknown of "what are these kids up for (emotionally, more than physically)?" as well as with respect to easing into the whole altitude thing. Our plan, then, is to take the park's tremendous shuttle system (free shuttles to and from some of the more popular trailheads), and hike a point-to-point from Bear Lake Trailhead (about 9,475 ft elevation) to Bierstadt Lake and out to the next trailhead, a total of about 3 miles. Definitely some climbing (and at 1,000 ft above our campground), but nothing too rigorous, considering where we're at.Now, I'd done much reading and cross-referencing of book and my topo map in advance of the trip (no way!) and planned out possible- to likely- hikes, based on a combination of feasibility, potential awesomeness, and lack of crowds. Many sources had recommended getting "an early start" both in terms of good wildlife viewing (dawn, no surprise there) and also to beat the crowds. Based on my experience (primarily in MN State Parks, and never before, actually, in a national park), however, I figured "Hey, it's sort of peak season, but since the work week just started (this was Monday), the foot traffic should be pretty light." Also, based on pretty much every hiking episode I'd ever had in publicly-owned lands, my assumption was that as soon as we were about an eighth of a mile from the trail head, we would be lucky to see another person. The eye-opening contradiction to both of those assumptions was to be my second great rumination of the trip.
The reality is that LOTS OF FUCKING PEOPLE VISIT ROCKY MOUNTAIN NATIONAL PARK. And they're not just there for the weekend (duh - it's their summer trip). They are there all week, and they're there to hike. Many of them, anyway. Now, there are plenty more people who are just there to mob Trail Ridge Drive (see future post), and probably quite a few more who are there to buy a sweatshirt that says "Estes Park (see past post). But when you're hiking a point-to-point that begins from probably the most popular trailhead in the fifth most popular National Park in the country, you're not gonna be alone. I had a growing sense of this, as we rode, crammed on a shuttle bus that was standing room only, but it was ramrodded home as we disembarked amid a crowd of hikers, photographers, and day-trippers of all ages, nationalities, and (seeming) preparedness. You are SHOCKINGLY, JARRINGLY not alone. I mused to myself whether golf "tee times" would help space things out at the trailhead, but that would have been an impossibility (had it not been silly in the first place) as there was too steady a stream of folks issuing off on the trail. Now, in fairness, the Bear Head trail branches immediately off in a few options, ranging from a leisurely half-mile nature stroll on a flat wood-chip trail to a rugged overnighter that traverse 12,000+ foot peaks and continue on to cross the Continental Divide. We were somewhere in the middle (well, a little closer to the former end of the spectrum), but in reality a number of people left the trail we were on as we climbed a couple of hundred feet and wound our way through aspen and ponderosa & lodgepole pines for a long, higher-altitude stretch of our hike. Even so, we were rarely in a position where another party wasn't visible somewhere in front or behind us.
| Miraculously, just Sharon & Rose, here. |
Now, there was a "T" right before Bierstadt Lake, at which we made the decision to take the shortest route to exit the hike without actually seeing the lake, owing partly to time (we'd had a pretty leisurely pace which, again, was kid-driven) and partly because we could see some gathering clouds and we were faced with a 500 foot descent down the mostly exposed side of a mountain and didn't want that to coincide with one of the Rocky's famous & frequent afternoon outbursts. That last descent ended up presenting the most expansive, striking views of the day and, incidentally the greatest degree of solitude, as we only met a couple of parties traveling either way (up or down) for the final mile or so. We did, however, perfectly coincide with an afternoon thunderstorm. I'd been carrying Rosie on my shoulders because "(her) legs hurt," but when the storm looked imminent, I put the kid down. Everyone donned our raincoats and we instructed the girls to speed along ahead, and try to reach lower ground. A sprinkle began, followed by thunder and a steady rain, and then light hail, as we were all trotting along, realizing that (in spite of feeling like we were in the upper echelon of general equipment preparedness vs. most of whom we'd encountered) ponchos would have probably been more practical than raincoats, which we ended up stretching out over our daypacks. I do regret that the storm (which ended up being brief, with things clearing completely, minutes after we arrived at the trailhead shelter) disrupted what would have probably been by far the most inspiring and rewarding part of the hike.
| Beginning the descent, with clouds gathering, pre-storm. |
In any event, here is the rumination, which is of such significance to me, that it, alone (had our Rocky Mountain adventure not been rewarding in any other way - which it ultimately was), may well be worth the great amount of effort, expense, and time that this trip consumed: I value solitude in my exploration of this world (and, perhaps naturally, especially in my experiences in nature). Possibly above all other things. This doesn't seem all that groundbreaking. Doesn't everyone? Well, maybe not to the extent that I now realize I do.
Sharon and I have had the recurring discussion about labeling people "introvert" and "extrovert" and how, although it is fundamentally based on where you get your energy, it can be a very unhelpful categorization, because the layers are too many and too nuanced to unpack. I think a lot of people would call me an extrovert. After all: I love a good party. And I certainly don't mind being the center of attention in many situations, whether as frontman of a band, or merely when regaling the assembled in a social gathering. In contrast, such events (or the prospect of them) is absolutely draining to my wife. We can finish a night out with friends after which she needs recovery time, whereas I feel energized. But I can't go to the State Fair. I just can't do it. It makes me want to curl up just thinking about it. Same for super busy airports, museums, sporting events, concerts (I KNOW RIGHT) and, apparently, national parks. Claustrophobia. Knots in the stomach. A weird negative and poisonous-feeling focus on the differences between the people I see and myself. Just awful. Sharon would prefer having a place to herself, of course, but can apparently pretty easily separate herself and have a personal experience that is not diminished much by the presence of others.
Anyway, I find this whole thing fascinating. But the ramifications, if I really think about it, are astounding. I'd always figured that, were money not an issue, I would probably get around to seeing many of the "great attractions of the world." The Sphinx, perhaps. The Blarney Stone. Abbey Road. The Liberty Bell. Whatever. Suddenly, I realize that - quite to the contrary - I would be wise to not go NEAR those places. Or else to approach them from the other side (North Rim of the Grand Canyon, for example) or in an off-season, if that's possible (per my earlier post: I'd seen Mount Rushmore when it was just me and one other guy, in November 1996. It was pretty cool!). The prospect of being in Times Square when the New Year's Ball drops ranks only slightly below having a candiru gnaw the wall of my urethra in my list of least-preferred pastimes. The reality is that everybody who can, is going to see the great places of the world. Worse yet, the rich and privileged (among whom I never feel particularly comfortable) are over-represented at those place. Better, I think my re-calibration would be to find the quiet, yet beautiful places of the world with (consider Rushmore, MN. well...one out of two ain't bad...) the former as the primary pre-requisite. As an unexpected aside: our campsite would prove to be the location in which we found the most reliable solitude, repeatedly throughout stay. Nothing wrong with having those moments to close your day out, I say.
| Lucy finding her own quiet moment, as day wound down. |